Copyright Royalty Board to Kill the Golden Goose

Print the article

This entry was posted on 3/6/2007 9:22 AM and is filed under Music.

Copyright Royalty Board (CR Choking the Golden Goose

 

When’s the last time you read the story of the Golden Goose?  Or if you’ve never heard the original, now’s your opportunity.

 

The Copyright Royalty Board is an arm of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), constituted by member performers.  The CRB, through an associated company, SoundExchange, keeps track of webcasting and collects royalties to be distributed to performers and background singers (who do not receive royalties from traditional licensing companies such as BMI, ASCAP, and SESAC).

 

Without going into the details of the claims made by the several sides of this debate (and subsequent laws that come from it), suffice it to say that as of March 2, 2007 it appears as if MOST webcasts will disappear from the Internet.

 

What do we mean by ‘most’? 

 

In all likelihood, the webcast(s) you love and listen to—the ones that provide the programming that neither commercial nor non-commercial terrestrial radio stations offer, nor do the special TV music channels, or satellite—will soon be history.

 

The CRB has come out with new royalty rates, retroactive to January 1, 2006, that will absolutely put most webcasters out of business overnight.

 

There’s a big question as to whether the large webcasters will be able to survive (e.g. one projection on the back royalties that AOL will owe for the past 14 months is $20,000,000) !!!

 

Once the CRB has killed webcasting, where will they get the golden eggs to divide between their performer and background singer members?

 

Where will those same artists find outlets to expose their new performances (one can be certain that it won’t happen on traditional radio stations or satellite—each is aimed toward mass audiences, not specialty audiences).

 

If you love Beach Music—cross your fingers.

 

We’ve always said at ESN that we would not go to a subscription service.  Nor will we.  Even if we did, it wouldn’t make any difference, i.e. you don’t want to hear how much each listener would have to pay for this or any other webcaster to simply be able to break even.

 

Even advertising sales would fall short.  Early projections demonstrate that most webcasters would have to immediately increase their revenues from 150—300% simply to continue the streaming services they offer now, let alone make any kind of a living.

 

Economists who have testified before the CRB in the past year have been rather cavalier in their dismissal of small webcasters, saying that they are too small to be of any importance and should be ignored.

 

Isn’t it odd that this is exactly what the RIAA (parent of the CR purports to be protecting on behalf of performers?  (Because the performers and background singers are ‘too small’ to be ‘significant’?  That’s why they aren’t covered by the traditional licensing services).

 

 Is this symptomatic of today’s mindset in the country and thus reflected in our government?

 

Do we believe that the little guy and gal don’t really matter economically? 

 

If so, then why does the government annoy the little guy and gal for yearly taxes?  Why do major record and media companies count the little guys in Nielsen ratings, Arbitron ratings, and CD and MP3 download sales?

 

Ignoring the little guy is popular when it serves the purposes of organizations that conjure control strategies in order to force their agendas onto a ‘free economy.’

 

Testifying economists make allusions that the economy doesn’t ‘need’ the small Webcasters in order for the webcast industry to grow.  These are the people who did not invent the internet nor did they anticipate its form of radical democracy that has turned the world upside down (re: the many communist countries which go to enormous expense to prevent their people from tapping into the internet because it permits a free economy of thought as well as business growth).

 

Those who desire to control the growth that permeates the internet both misunderstand growth and how it is in the fiber of human action – not ancillary and subject to arbitrary agendas.

 

In the Beach Music World, the Endless Summer Network has always been on the side of the ‘small’ performers, writers, arrangers, composers, booking agents, nightclubs, managers, producers, and dozens of others related directly or indirectly to the Beach Music industry.

 

We play hundreds of songs by the aforementioned that are never played by traditional media outlets.   The marquee of internet webcasting is an invaluable resource for performers of all genre of music. 

 

Unfortunately, this Goose is so very tasty there are some who want to control Internet Goosedom to fill their tables and no one else’s.  Certainly not those of us who comprise the Internet World—which is all of us.

Fessa' Hook 3-6-07

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 3/6/2007 1:48 PM Doyle wrote:
      Dang, that was good 'Fessa!! How much do you want the check to be?
      Reply to this
    • 3/6/2007 3:44 PM Willie C wrote:
      John,well done article. Its a shame that the RIAA and their CRB don't see the value, to the performers and writers, who they are suppose to protect, that webcasting provides.
      Reply to this
    • 3/7/2007 9:16 PM Brent wrote:
      Great but disturbing article John. When do you suspect this elimination of "MOST" webcasters will occur?
      Reply to this
    • 3/10/2007 9:03 AM jc wrote:
      Hope you don't go away. We need to keep hearing your programming in cities too far from your broadcast tower.
      Would rather see a subscription service started than to lose you totally because of these short sited regulators.
      Reply to this
    • 3/14/2007 12:45 PM Dick Mc wrote:
      Unbelievable....I hope this doesn't happen, I live in Florida where beach music only exists in a precious few places and without Beachshag I might have to move back to the Carolinas, not a bad option mind you but I'm sure allot of folks in the Carolinas listen to Beachshag as well. Without Beachshag I would only be left with the Golf Channel....not a pretty sight. Keep up the good work John, we are on your side and the right to play the best music ever recorded.
      Reply to this
    • 3/19/2007 2:42 PM MarthaK wrote:
      Fessa!
      Thanks for the frank article. As a newcomer to beach music, I first hear the music that I turn around and buy on your station. Without ESN, I won't hear it and won't buy it.
      Just like a skip in an old 45 or LP, folks in the music business are stuck on stupid.
      Reply to this
    • 3/21/2007 10:21 AM Madmax wrote:
      Fessa Hook - You know we don't want you to go away in our life time. So many great songs have been discovered on your radio shows and webcast. Most of us in the "Beach Music" world would never hear these great songs if not for broadcasters such as yourself. Everyone should write to their representative in DC and asked that these regulations not be enacted.
      Thanks again for all you do - hope to see you soon in the Greensboro area.
      Reply to this
    • 3/21/2007 1:42 PM Big Bob wrote:
      Please, please don't abandon us. Here in Kentucky we don't have any local channels that I can find that play Beach shag. I listen to you almost daily for 4 to 6 hours working in a dispatch center.
      Reply to this
    • 3/23/2007 9:11 AM JCS wrote:
      Is there anything we can do? Anyone we can write to??? I love beach music and it isn't available on regular radio stations. Thanks for your article.
      Reply to this
    • 3/23/2007 12:02 PM RoadDog wrote:
      We finally got high speed cable internet service and hopefully no more music stoppage as often happened with dial up.

      I'd sure hate to lose your station as well as the myriad of others that bring music that usually doesn't get played.
      Reply to this
    • 3/24/2007 8:55 AM Ed Morrison wrote:
      Thanks John. Living this far from paradise, it's refreshing to listen to your station that plays more than just top 40 beach music. It seems that what you say is alarmingly true. Not only do certain groups want the goose and the egg. They want the entire flock.
      Reply to this
    • 3/24/2007 10:50 PM Larry Shaffette wrote:
      Beach music here in Louisiana is not obtainable except with this internet radio show. Sure, I have a few CDs from Waxmuseum and a jukebox full of 45s from the beach (Jacksonville, NC), but that is never enough. This is the only station that we webcast. We have been tuned-in for a number of years, probably day-one. Thanks John, that is all I can add. Oh yes, thank to Charlie Byrd from so many many years ago for our introductions to Beach Music.
      Reply to this
    • 3/26/2007 2:47 AM Gary wrote:
      I agree with you Fessa. Your webcast is the only option I'm aware of to listen to this type of music in the Tampa Bay, Florida area. Hope you can survive. Like your shows.
      Reply to this
    • 3/28/2007 10:15 PM Stephan Lapping wrote:
      John - this is an excellent article about an interesting dilemma! First, it is important to point out some givens in the music "business" as opposed to the "art". It is in fact a business and the song is the "product". Someone owns the rights to that product and is paid for it. Unlike a product that sells at Walmart where the manufacturer is paid for each unit it sells off the shelf, the owner of the song (remember, that the owner may not necessarily be the artist that wrote, sang, or played)gets paid for the number of CD's, cassettes, 8 tracks, records (for those of you that remember those big black things); the number of times it gets played on radio stations, a cut from licenses that restuarants and bars pay to ASCAP and BMI (royalty clearing houses)for live performance music in their establishments, TV and movie performance, royalties from someone else recording the song, etc.

      It's not really a question of whether or not there should be compensation for the owner of the song, but what is a fair amount in the case of the small internet "radio" station. By analogy, nobody expects to walk into the local music store and walk out with your favorite CD for nothing. However, the problem now is that internet radio, under the new royalty scheme must first track plays of songs (i.e. exact record keeping and reporting) and pay a higher (and ever increasing royalty rate over the next 10 years)per song royalty per song.

      As a songwriter and a musician (semi-professional, which means I get paid just a little bit more than what it costs me to do it), I have a strong sense that the artist should be compensated for his/her work. As a lawyer in real life I understand that the owner of a song has the right to compensation every time it is played, recorded or used by someone else. And it is important to keep in mind that the internet is a huge source of revenue for some outlets (e.g. iTunes is downloading for a fee approx. 3 million songs a day @ at little less than a dollar a song - do the math!). Yet, we love the little guy, we all have our own peculiarities, and we are willing to accomodate him in our approach to the issue. In beach music, where a big hit may measure several thousand units, the RIAA barely registers a blip on the radar screen. Surely, there must be a way to subdivide or categorize internet radio stations so that there is a reasonable royalty scheme that both compensates the song owner but allows the niche internet radio station to continue, because in the end, the owner of the song benefits by the exposure.

      Beach music is not the only genre to be affected. I'm sure that there are internet radio stations for Mongolian throat singing, Gregorian chants, whatever. It is internet radio that makes obscure music available. There must be a way to get rid of the broad brush that paints the small internet "niche" radio station with huge providers like AOL. Surely there can be a reasonable compromise.
      Reply to this
    • 4/29/2007 5:56 PM John E Waters wrote:
      I will do my best to keep HOT 100 USA on the net, but I will have to figure out a way to make it work. As of now, it is only a hobby, and I pay for it out of my own pocket because of my love for Beach Music.
      THe CRB ruling may be overturned by Congress, a bill in the House has been introduced by a Congressman from Washington, and is in need of co-sponsors. (HR-2060). Please spread the word, and write to your Congressman and tell him or her about this Bill.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.